Why Are Control Loops Operated in Manual Mode?

 

Why Tracking Your Process Mode Can Be a Big Deal

Why do manufacturers automate production? Why do they spend millions each year on new equipment and software? Those questions are pretty straight forward, and the answers seem obvious. Clearly automation allows manufacturers to improve the control of complex and business-critical processes. Surely automation reduces the cost of operation by enhancing production output while reducing production-related waste. But if that’s the case, then why do staff at automated facilities choose to operate production in any mode other than “auto”?

Two metrics that shed light on this topic are Mode Changes – especially Manual Mode – and Percent Time in Normal. Mode Changes monitors the number of interventions to a given loop that 1) involve a change to the controller’s mode and 2) directly affect the Controller Output. In a related fashion Percent Time in Normal calculates the amount of time that the loop operates in its intended or “design” mode. Each helps to identify control loops that are subject to operator intervention. Whether due to inconsistent sensor readings, high variability due to poor mechanics, or poor controller tuning, these metrics offer valuable insight into the frequency and duration of those interventions.

  • Confidence Game

Lots of things can go wrong at a typical production facility. Production processes are inherently dynamic and they can be difficult to control. Some are just plain dangerous. One reason why production staff choose to operate processes in a mode other than auto is a lack of confidence in the process and its associated instrumentation. If a valve is sticky or a sensor is worn out, then both control and confidence can be compromised. Production staff regularly cite a lack of confidence when choosing to operate processes manually. More often than not their lack of confidence is a symptom of a bigger issue.

  • Stepping Down

Lost confidence shouldn’t be equated strictly with manual operation. Plenty of processes that are running in automatic are designed to operate in an alternate setting. Consider one or more loops intended for operation in remote cascade in conjunction with an MPC solution. If the MPC solution’s models are outdated and staff lack confidence in its ability maintain safe operation, then they may choose to step it down and operate the loops in automatic mode.

  • Learning Curve

In the complex world of process automation the answer may simply be to provide more education. Even a modest sized production facility operates hundreds of PID control loops using a thousand or more different instruments. Such an expanse of systems and processes can be overwhelming. On the surface manual operation may appear like the right approach for production staff that haven’t been thoroughly trained.

Among others, the goals of automation are to improve control and to increase profitability. Technologies that monitor plant-wide performance can help process manufacturers to achieve those goals by identifying individual control loops that are not operating as intended. Metrics such as Mode Changes and Percent Time in Normal are tools that quantify the frequency and the duration of those interventions.

These resources offer related content:

Untitled design (1)

What is the Difference Between Traditional and State-Based Process Analytics? How Do State-Based Analytical Tools Distinguish Conditions from States?

For coffee lovers, creating the perfect cup may be a lifelong pursuit. For sure there are dozens of factors that affect any particular pour. Basic ones include the specific type of coffee beans and the amount of sugar and/or cream used. If a more serious...

How Do I Detect Valve Issues and Prevent Failures?

  Control Loop Monitoring Solutions Provide Valuable Early Detection of Valve Stiction and Valve Deadband It's generally known that the behavior of final control elements (FCEs) (valves, air handlers, etc.) change over time. Like most things the dynamics of FCEs are different from the time...
Industrial 4.0SMALL

What are the differences between Industry 4.0, Big Data and the IIoT?

A few buzzwords seem to dominate today’s manufacturing trade press. Big Data, the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT), and Industry 4.0 are a few of the big ideas that are currently crowding out other topics. Unfortunately, all too often these three terms are being used...

Still looking for more?

Now that you’ve gotten the basics, connect with our team to learn how our people, processes and technologies can help you optimize.